Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> writes:
>
>
> True, but that (negating multiple namespaces) is a feature we nearly
> added just before going to REC, and probably will add in 1.1.
That's good news
>
>>The closest choice which you have (any namespace except the target)
>>cannot be used either since it would accept ns2 and break the Unique
>>Particle Attribution rule.
>>
>
> Not so. The following is fine:
>
> <xs:element name="foo">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element ref="ns1:bar"/>
> <xs:element ref="ns2:bar"/>
> <xs:any namespace="##other"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
Yes (my mistake) but it's a dangerous game with multiple constraints and
the following would not be fine:
<xs:element name="foo">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="ns1:bar"/>
<xs:element ref="ns2:bar" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:any namespace="##other"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
Eric
--
Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML.
http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
