• From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 17:54:09 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:25 PM
> To: Elliotte Rusty Harold; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Re: determining ID-ness in XML
> 

> Independent parties should not be extending 
> the rules for the system vocabulary.  That 
> is precisely what so many here beat MS up for. 

I thought Elliotte Harold was suggesting that both the namespace mechanism
as well as PIs provide a pre-approved way of extending the rules to
accomodate ID-ness. Unless I'm missing something, declaring an attribute to
be in the "id namespace" could work as well or better as the PI suggestion
... *if* we want to propose some interim solution that doesn't require a W3C
Recommendation.

• Prev by Date: Common Sense approach to ID and IDness
• Next by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread