[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 17:33:29 -0500



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@m...]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:08 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Re: determining ID-ness in XML
> 

> 
> The latter solution doesn't demand PIs. It just prevents us from 
> using the xml: prefix. If we wanted to be orthogonal to the W3C, then 
> it's easy enough to define an xid:id prefix with xid mapped to 
> http://xml.org/id/ or something like that. I think this has already 
> been suggested as a way of adding multiple IDs to things. There's no 
> need to get PIs involved.

Duh, right! They could be ordinary namespace prefixes with declarations.  I
guess I got carried away with the "xml:"-ness and forgot about the
namespace-ness of the ID-ness proposal.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member