• To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Interoperability [long]
• From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@x...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 08:03:23 -0500
• In-reply-to: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E401D87189@u...>
• User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.1.3108

On 01/11/15 6:14 PM, "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
wrote:
> 
> - The DOM WG naively believed a literal reading of the namespace spec and
> treats prefixes as mere syntax sugar and URIs as the "real thing".  This
> causes problems when interoperating with specs that treat prefixes as being
> significant.

Care to expand on this? I cannot tell if you are being serious or ironic
(which, when you think about it, is... well I'm not sure what word describes
it).

Cheers,
Bob

• References:
  • RE: Interoperability [long]
    • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>

• Prev by Date: Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• Next by Date: Packaging (was Re: Interoperability)
• Previous by thread: Re: Interoperability [long]
• Next by thread: RE: Interoperability [long]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread