• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 12:10:02 +0000
• In-reply-to: <200111161150.LAA08592@p...>
• References: <5.0.2.1.0.20011116100756.01fdd370@p...><PJEGLGKIAHHKOPGBPEIGOEEICBAA.donalds@i...><PJEGLGKIAHHKOPGBPEIGOEEICBAA.donalds@i...><5.0.2.1.0.20011116100756.01fdd370@p...>

At 11:50 16/11/2001 +0000, David Carlisle wrote:

>For displaying arbitrary XML it seems that a transformation language is
>always going to be required.

Yes, I agree with this and have some specific proposals I want
to make to the XML development community around this
area. I hope to get to this in the very near future.

Sean

• References:
  • Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
    • From: "Don Smith" <donalds@i...>
  • Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Interoperability [long]
• Next by Date: Re: Interoperability [long]
• Previous by thread: Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• Next by thread: RE: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread