• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: APOLOGY: Misattribution: (Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML)
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 11:30:16 +0000
• In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.0.20011124103728.01ce9ea8@p...>
• References: <E167N2Z-0002qU-00@s...><3BFC0325.4CB96734@f...><9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E401A85312@u...><1006356620.19619.6.camel@l...><3BFC0325.4CB96734@f...>

All,

A incorrectly attributed this comment:
(http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200111/msg00830.html)

>>I think this is the right approach... which is why I always tell people that
>>XML is just data, and that the application determines it's interpretation.

to Henry Thomson.

It should have been Gavin Thomas Nicol.
(http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200111/msg00827.html)

Apologies to both Henry and Gavin.

regards,
Sean McGrath

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: APOLOGY: Misattribution: (Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML)
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• References:
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: Re: APOLOGY: Misattribution: (Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread