• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 11:20:58 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.0.20011124111238.01bca918@p...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <5.0.2.1.0.20011124103728.01ce9ea8@p...> <5.0.2.1.0.20011124111238.01bca918@p...>

> I am arguing for a data model for XML. There is no
> conflict between having a data model for XML - so that we all know
> what the parsing *layers* do and emit - and having user defined
> vocabularies!

Sure, a data model is fine, and gives a basis for formalism.... I argued for 
that in the DOM WG until I was blue in the face. 

That said, few application deal with that model directly, and there are a 
number of slants one can take. Editing applications, for example, really do 
need to know about whitespace, attribute ordering, etc. etc. etc. where most 
data processing applications don't.

• References:
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by Date: Re: XML feature manifest/profile (was RE:: Re: determining ID-ness in XML )
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: APOLOGY: Misattribution: (Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread