• To: "'K. Ari Krupnikov'" <ari@c...>,<michael.h.kay@n...>
• Subject: RE: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:54:00 -0000
• Cc: "'Jonathan Borden'" <jborden@m...>,"'David Brownell'" <david-b@p...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3BF1053D.36FF2D59@c...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> Michael Kay wrote:
> > > So why do we need _another_ mechanism to declare IDs?
> > >
> > Well, one reason is that an XML document produced as the output of an
XSLT
> > transformation will never have an internal subset.
>
> Maybe that should be fixed in XSLT, not in XML?
>
It would be easier to fix it in XSLT if it was first fixed in the InfoSet...

Mike Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
    • From: "K. Ari Krupnikov" <ari@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Next by Date: RE: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Previous by thread: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Next by thread: RE: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread