• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:22:39 +0100
• References: <000701c16c42$45841550$ddc469d5@pcukmka>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011023

Michael Kay wrote:

>>Michael Kay wrote:
>>
>>>Well, one reason is that an XML document produced as the output of an
>>>
> XSLT
> 
>>>transformation will never have an internal subset.
>>>
>>Maybe that should be fixed in XSLT, not in XML?
>>
>>
> It would be easier to fix it in XSLT if it was first fixed in the InfoSet...


Is-it a new kind of game? Or maybe a private joke?

Hold-on, Mike! We sympathize that W3C is probably not fun everyday but 
you had accustomed us to a different kind of posts!

Eric (still respectful but relieved he can't access the W3C member pages)


> 
> Mike Kay
> 
--

Rendez-vous a` Paris pour le Forum XML.
                    http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Next by Date: Re: annotations outside validation
• Previous by thread: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
• Next by thread: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread