• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:33:01 +0000
• In-reply-to: <002201c1725d$fdc42620$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• References: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E401A85312@u...>

At 18:27 21/11/2001 +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>
>So then we get
>   XML
>     +/- validation
>     +/- PSVI  contributions
>     +/- namespace
>     +/- Blubbery
>     +/- ids
>     +/- xml:base
>     +/- xml:include
>     +/- xlink embed
>
>= 256 flavours of XML systems even without addressing entity defaulting.
>
>Thin uncordinated layers are the recipe for non-interoperability.

Amen!

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread