• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:27:35 +1100
• References: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E401A85312@u...>

 From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
 
> These potential complications seem to suggest that doing any more than the
> bare minimum could start to get hairy. I'm inclined against adding ISO
> entities, multiple ids/element, namespace support, etc. in the first
> iteration.
 
So then we get
  XML
    +/- validation
    +/- PSVI  contributions
    +/- namespace
    +/- Blubbery
    +/- ids
    +/- xml:base
    +/- xml:include
    +/- xlink embed
   
= 256 flavours of XML systems even without addressing entity defaulting.

Thin uncordinated layers are the recipe for non-interoperability.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: tricky validation problem w multiple schemas
• Next by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread