• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:45:58 -0700

At 12:18 PM 26/09/01 -0700, Tom Bradford wrote:
>Has XML run its course?  No.  But the W3C *has* outlived its usefulness,
>and it's time that another, more responsible, entity took over the
>future of XML's evolution.

What kind of entity would be appropriate?  Something
existing, or is time to start with something new? -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Has XML run its course?
    • From: Tom Bradford <bradford@d...>

• References:
  • Has XML run its course?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Has XML run its course?
    • From: Tom Bradford <bradford@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Has XML run its course?
• Next by Date: Re: Has XML run its course?
• Previous by thread: Re: Has XML run its course?
• Next by thread: Re: Has XML run its course?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread