• From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• To: 'xml-dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:21:02 -0700

> 1.  What about Schemas is hard?

I think one important factor is the readability.  While DTD is arcane, I
find it more readable than XML Schema.  XML Schema is more verbose,
fragmented, and complex than DTD.  With a DTD file, I can see the structure
at a glance (as long as the author didn't go overboard with parameter
entities), but not so with XML Schema where structure is hidden in a jungle
of elements.  In this jungle, namespace declarations dangle like vines and
obstructs your view of the whole.  Visual tools helps but their GUI design
usually limits 'field-of-vision' to one object at a time.

I am sure there are other facets, but readability seems to be a key factor.

Best,

Don Park
Docuverse

• References:
  • Why Are Schemas Hard? (WAS RE: "Uh, what do I need this for" (was RE:XML.COM: How I Learne d t o Love daBomb))
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
• Next by Date: RE: Namespaces, W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX Filters forNamespaceProcessing)
• Previous by thread: Re: Why Are Schemas Hard?
• Next by thread: RE: "Uh, what do I need this for" (was RE: XML.COM: How I Learne d t o Love daBomb)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread