Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
1. What about Schemas is hard?
2. Are some of the issues about things Schemas cannot
represent (eg, the co-occurrence constraints)?
I'm missing something here. With a product like
XML Spy for sanity checking, I don't seem to find
the Schemas hard to develop. That doesn't say
that implementing a system around a schema isn't
hard, but I am curious what others are struggling with.
Yes, the spec is tough (they all are), but the primer isn't, there
are dozens of web articles on learning schemas, and
a week or so with a beta of an IDE seems to cover
the sanity checks.
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Brennan [mailto:Michael_Brennan@a...]
> From: Nicolas LEHUEN [mailto:nicolas.lehuen@u...]
> 5) Our greatest current problem is about schemas. As I've
> wrote previously
> on this list, our approach raises a dire need of a simple
> schema language,
> simple enough so that developers can write and use schemas
> without having to
> read thousands of pages of specifications. We are currently
> investigating
> languages such as RELAX NG, Schematron, Examplotron or a
> custom language we
> named RESCALE to solve this problem.
We are in agreement there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
