• From: "Anderson, John" <John@B...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:03:35 +0200

Greetings assembled gurus,

There appears to be a conflict in the XSD spec for notation declarations. 3.12.1 gives the following as properties of the notation schema component:

{system identifier} Optional if {public identifier} is present. A URI reference.
{public identifier} Optional if {system identifier} is present. A public identifier, as defined in [XML 1.0 (Second Edition)].

However, 3.12.2 (XML Representation) indicates that a public identifier is mandatory. This would be a seemingly unnecessary divergence from XML1.0 which doesn't require public id (so long as system id is present). The IBM SQC complains about it if a public id is missing, XMLSpy doesn't and I haven't tested any others.

Anyone care to clarify this? In any case, this is a bug in the spec, but I presume 3.12.1 is correct unless someone can definitively tell me otherwise.

John

_______________________________________________________
John Anderson
CTO Barbadosoft  The XML Management Company
+31 (0)20 750 7582 / +31 (0)6 65 347 448 / www.barbadosoft.com

- putting the "X" in "XML" -

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Notations in XSD - a bug???
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: AND (Another Namespace Dilemma) ... DTD Validation
• Next by Date: Re: AND (Another Namespace Dilemma) ... DTD Validation
• Previous by thread: Re: (Re)^2: Question on id constraints
• Next by thread: Re: Notations in XSD - a bug???
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread