• From: Christian Nentwich <c.nentwich@c...>
• To: mrossi@c...
• Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:24:40 -0400

> Now I can write a DTD for all the "furn" elements with or without the
> "furn:" prefix (although it's a pain), using something like:
> But if I don't know what prefix is going to be used there's no hope of
> validating an instance. Am I missing something?

Here you have a short example fragment from one of our DTDs. Yes, it
wasn't very pleasant to write, but luckily there aren't that many
elements in it.

<!ENTITY % xlinkit-namespace-prefix "xlinkit">
<!ENTITY % LinkBase "%xlinkit-namespace-prefix;:LinkBase">
<!ENTITY % ConsistencyLink "%xlinkit-namespace-prefix;:ConsistencyLink">
<!ENTITY % Locator "%xlinkit-namespace-prefix;:Locator">
<!ENTITY % State "%xlinkit-namespace-prefix;:State">
<!ENTITY % Go "%xlinkit-namespace-prefix;:Go">
 
<!-- A linkbase consists of a set of consistency links
     that result from the evaluation of the consistency rules -->
 
<!ELEMENT %LinkBase; (%ConsistencyLink;)*>
<!ATTLIST %LinkBase;
        docSet          CDATA           #REQUIRED
        ruleSet         CDATA           #REQUIRED
        date            CDATA           #REQUIRED>

Christian

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: AND (Another Namespace Dilemma) ... DTD Validation
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• References:
  • AND (Another Namespace Dilemma) ... DTD Validation
    • From: mrossi@c...

• Prev by Date: Re: AND (Another Namespace Dilemma) ... DTD Validation
• Next by Date: Notations in XSD - a bug???
• Previous by thread: Re: AND (Another Namespace Dilemma) ... DTD Validation
• Next by thread: Re: AND (Another Namespace Dilemma) ... DTD Validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread