Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
From: "Ann Navarro" <ann@w...> > Why wouldn't it be ok? I don't believe that allowing blueberry label only when blueberry capabilities are used is practical. It means that the header for a document must be generated with awareness of the contents (or, at least, the generator of the contents.) That would be cumbersome in the case of streaming processes, and would require an extended DOM for in-memory. For example, the DOM would require two-passes to serialize (one to see if Bluberry is used, to set the header, and one to do the output) for some implementations. Do Blueberry documents require a Blueberry DOM and Blueberry SAX handler? (I.e., ones which ascertain what features are used. That is why I think forget a new version and just make it a fix for the new edition, pre-announced. Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
