• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, www-xml-blueberry-comments@w...
• Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:30:04 -0400

At 04:17 PM 7/23/2001 +0800, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>  From: "Ann Navarro" <ann@w...>
>  > Why wouldn't it be ok?
>
>I don't believe that allowing blueberry label only when
>blueberry capabilities are used is practical.

I agree.



>That is why I think forget a new version and just make it
>a fix for the new edition, pre-announced.

I don't think it really matters if it's a new version or an errata fix. 
Countless other specs and technologies have dealt with versioning issues -- 
XML isn't unique, and it won't break  the world if it changes any more than 
any other version broke any other world.

Ann


Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com/
Now in print! Effective Web Design, 2nd Edition
http://www.webgeek.com/books/
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/	

• References:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Conversion tools
• Next by Date: Announce: XML-CML Software release on http://www.xml-cml.org/
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread