• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>,"'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>,"'sax-devel@l...'" <sax-devel@l...>,"'sax-users@l...'" <sax-users@l...>
• Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:55:37 -0500

Because SAX was developed under Megginson's mentoring by 
XML-Dev members, not the W3C.   SAX is not a standard.  It is a 
good idea done by those who needed it done quickly and 
precisely.

Now the question is where it should be kept for sustainment 
and future development.  Apparently, those who care enough 
to take change picked SourceForge.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas LEHUEN [mailto:nicolas.lehuen@u...]

The question may be completely out of scope here, and I'm readying myself
for a flame mail flood, but how come such a standard end being hosted on
SourceForge ?

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX2 bugs -- please file!
• Next by Date: RE: ANN: SAX Filters for Namespace Processing
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2 bugs -- please file!
• Next by thread: xerces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread