• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 13:55:34 -0400

Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:

> The question may be completely out of scope here, and I'm readying myself
> for a flame mail flood, but how come such a standard end being hosted on
> SourceForge ?


Because it is a neutral location.


> What is the relationship with the version on David Meggison's site
> (http://www.megginson.com/SAX/Java/index.html) ? 


David is turning over SAX to the community.

 
> Maybe the root question is : why is SAX under the org.xml.sax package,
> whereas DOM is in the org.w3c.dom ? Why isn't SAX hosted on the W3C site ?
> Is there an historical / legal / other reason for this ?

SAX is not a W3C product.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• References:
  • RE: SAX2 bugs -- please file!
    • From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespaces, W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX Filters forNamespaceProcessing)
• Next by Date: RE: SAX2 bugs -- please file!
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX2 bugs -- please file!
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2 bugs -- please file!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread