Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Since the W3C is talking up an architecture group, and because XML is a fundamental of the architecture, I would think before major release changes are proposed, that group would form and work on its recommendations to be added to others. <notaBene>I'm not in favor of closed groups that go off and plan the future in secret. Never have been, but the W3C is the owner of XML, does as it thinks, and in the case of a major release version, that group would be a consideration. Given the effect on other parts of the web architecture, it would be prudent to get that in motion if it is an inevitability before serious consideration or heated debates over a major features release.</notaBene> Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Ann Navarro [mailto:ann@w...] That may very well be, but you must be cognizant of the fact that you will (and very well should) get input that says "and here are some more ideas that WE think are required of a new version as well". Experience and difficulty with the current Rec are not a closed event unto those in the WG. Let us listen closely, lest we end up with a Rec that solves very few problems (with vague indications of forward work), and then refuses to do so yet again.
|
