• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:17:40 -0400

Ann Navarro wrote:


> That may very well be, but you must be cognizant of the fact that you 
> will (and very well should) get input that says "and here are some more 
> ideas that WE think are required of a new version as well".


Doubtless.  But note the last requirement in the draft.

 
> Let us listen closely, lest we end up with a Rec that solves very few 
> problems (with vague indications of forward work), and then refuses to 
> do so yet again.


That is, as far as I am concerned, the whole idea.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• References:
  • Closing Blueberry
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Closing Blueberry
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: reminder: OASIS ebXML IIC TC participation
• Next by Date: RE: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread