• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Justin Couch <justin@v...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:24:51 -0400

Justin Couch wrote:


> I don't believe so, at least from the Java perspective. DOM passes 
> everything thing in as a String.


True.

> All the underlying DOM implemenation
> needs to do is check what encoding is used for that string.


The encoding is irrelevant, and not available in Strings anyway.
But if you mean the character repertoire...

> If it finds
> something that is not US-ASCII then it sets the useBlueberry flag
> internally and off it goes.


It isn't ASCII that's at issue, but Unicode 2.0.


-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• References:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Justin Couch <justin@v...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schema - define a type
• Next by Date: RE: XML Schema - define a type
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread