• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 22:00:41 -0500

> In my very humble but biased opinion, DOM Level 3 is doing the 
> "right thing" in that the content models and validation component is a 
> separate, optional module. 

Agreed. When this idea of layering validation onto a parser was brought
up first in the XML WG, some felt is was heresy. I think parsing
and validation are logically orthoganal issues, and should be modelled as
such.

• References:
  • RE: Datatypes vs anarchy
    • From: Michael Champion <mike.champion@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...)
• Next by Date: RE: Names, Nmtokens, and ....
• Previous by thread: RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
• Next by thread: Element content
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread