• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 21:50:35 -0500

> a) I still don't believe that there is even one noncontrived 
> example where an element in an instance truly has ambiguous 
> semantics. 

In which case one wouldn't need schemas, right? After all, the
instance defines the semantics, right?

• References:
  • Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...)
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Names, Nmtokens, and ....
• Next by Date: RE: Datatypes vs anarchy
• Previous by thread: RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...)
• Next by thread: Re: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread