Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jonathan, Jonathan Borden wrote: > > An XPointer can be used as either a name or an address depending on the > form. The raw name form is a name, the child sequence form is an address and > the full form may combine characteristics of both. e.g. I am not contesting the fact that, generally speaking, a XPointer can be used as a name, but the fact that I don't want to assign to my user defined datatypes a name that depends on the location of my schema file and thus that in this case a XPointer is not convenient. > <xsd:simpleType name="unsignedInt" id="unsignedInt">.. > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema#unsignedInt is a perfectly good name > (IMHO) > > .../xsd:simpleType[@name='unsignedInt'] is also an fine name (IMHO) Yes I have no problem with these ones, but I consider file:yourSchema.xsd#myUnsignedInt or even http://example.org/yourSchema.xsd#myUnsignedInt as bad names since they depend on the actual physical location of the schema file. Eric -- Rendez-vous à Paris pour net2001. http://www.mynet2001.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
