• From: Richard Knapp <warped_user@y...>
• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:44:09 -0500 (EST)

>You might elaborate all the combinations:
>
><!ELEMENT Base ( First, 
>                 ( Second? | Third? | Fourth? 
>                   | (Second, Third) | (Third, Second) 
>                   | (Third, Fourth) | (Fourth, Third) 
>                   | (Second, Third, Fourth)
>                   | (Fourth, Second, Third)
>                   | (Third, Fourth, Second)
>                   | (Third, Second, Fourth)
>                   | ... you get the idea ...
>                 )
>               )

Hmm... After discussing this a bit more, we decided to impose an order on the Elements (a temporary 
time-out if nothing else). Since the number of Elements has grown to over six, having to specify each 
comination would be gross. 

Thanks for the feedback.

	- Richard



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• References:
  • Re: DTD Entity
    • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: IMHORe: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ?(was Re: XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.))
• Next by Date: Re: DTD Entity
• Previous by thread: Re: DTD Entity
• Next by thread: Re: DTD Entity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread