• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:04:43 -0500

Simon St.Laurent wrote -

To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>; "XML DEV" <xml-dev@l...>


> At 09:17 PM 3/12/01 -0500, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
> >Simon St.Laurent:
> > > Even if the message arrives burdened with data schemata, content
> > > models and canonical semantics which the recipient has pledged to honor,
in
> >the
> > > end he must instantiate the 'true' data, or semantics, or meaning of the
> > > message as whatever it is that he is specifically capable of using,
> >presumably
> > > by processing it to some locally meaningful outcome.
>
> It doesn't affect the rest of the argument, but I think that's Walter Perry.
>
>
Whoops! Sorry, Walter,  and thanks, Simon

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@s...>
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Handler for xml declaration
• Next by Date: Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
• Next by thread: Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread