• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 22:57:37 -0500

At 09:17 PM 3/12/01 -0500, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
>Simon St.Laurent:
> > Even if the message arrives burdened with data schemata, content
> > models and canonical semantics which the recipient has pledged to honor, in
>the
> > end he must instantiate the 'true' data, or semantics, or meaning of the
> > message as whatever it is that he is specifically capable of using,
>presumably
> > by processing it to some locally meaningful outcome.

It doesn't affect the rest of the argument, but I think that's Walter Perry.


Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly and Associates
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XMLSchema
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>

• References:
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@s...>
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ?(was Re:XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.))
• Next by Date: Re: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2
• Previous by thread: Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
• Next by thread: Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XMLSchema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread