• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 18:53:18 -0500

Jeff Rafter wrote:
>
>
> I have been looking at implementing the Infoset recenlty but have found
> that, as I move deeper into the 'abstraction',  I seem to
> gravitate less to
> the 'abtract' and more to the 'vague' nature of the Infoset.  I am looking
> for hints/tips on real world implementation of the InfoSet in the way of
> interfaces or strategies for representing the information items.
> Some of my
> biggest confusion centers around speed/memory and extensibility.  I
> apologize in advance if this question is vague, asking for too much...
>

'real world' implementations of the Infoset roughly include:

SAX
DOM
JDOM
XPath

The infoset is intended only as a model or abstract syntax to which an API
conforms.

-Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The less abstract Infoset
    • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>

• References:
  • The less abstract Infoset
    • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespaceURI.)
• Next by Date: RE: RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data typenamespaceURI.)
• Previous by thread: The less abstract Infoset
• Next by thread: Re: The less abstract Infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread