• From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 09:51:00 -0800

I have been looking at implementing the Infoset recenlty but have found
that, as I move deeper into the 'abstraction',  I seem to gravitate less to
the 'abtract' and more to the 'vague' nature of the Infoset.  I am looking
for hints/tips on real world implementation of the InfoSet in the way of
interfaces or strategies for representing the information items.  Some of my
biggest confusion centers around speed/memory and extensibility.  I
apologize in advance if this question is vague, asking for too much...

Thanks
Jeff Rafter

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: The less abstract Infoset
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • RE: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI.
    • From: "Biron,Paul V" <Paul.V.Biron@k...>
  • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI.
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI.
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI.
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI.)
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespaceURI.)
• Next by Date: Looking for help with MSXML CAB
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI
• Next by thread: RE: The less abstract Infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread