• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 10:41:00 -0600

I agree completely.  I suggested a process be proposed, 
not a schedule.  What you suggest sounds like a good 
start.  I request, respectfully, the requirements.

Dang, Rick, you may have to chair a committee. :-)
Or better... treat it like SAX and RDDL, and 
get a requirements statement from XML-Dev.

People like access.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@a...]

Perhaps all we need to standardize at the moment are (a couple of) useful
frameworks so that experimental and alternativc and niche and non-W3C
languages start life integrated into the general schema of things and not
orphaned.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Prev by Date: Any order (Re: best markup practices, different communities)
• Next by Date: Sun's use of "XML RPC"
• Previous by thread: Re: Rules & Grammars
• Next by thread: best markup practices, different communities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread