• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 01:11:03 +0800

From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@s...>

>The '&' model, which works extremely well for database recordsets and is
>effectively used every day all day in a wide variety of application, has
>somewhat catastrophic problems when introduced to the rest of the XML
>grammar, and was therefore excluded.  Data-oriented developers now get to
>worry about sequence on a much more regular basis.

Note that the problem of "in any order" does not necessarily cause problems
with grammars: it is an implementation decision whether to use FSMs for
those kinds of particles.  (And, if you are using some non-grammar-based
schema toolkit whose name I won't BORE everyone with, "in any order" does
not pose any problems at all :-)

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Prev by Date: History Part Quatre: Keeping Decisions In Scope (Was: Re: Reques tfor info about parser construction details)
• Next by Date: RE: Rules & Grammars
• Previous by thread: History Part Quatre: Keeping Decisions In Scope (Was: Re: Reques tfor info about parser construction details)
• Next by thread: Sun's use of "XML RPC"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread