• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 12:51:55 -0500

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Let me ask this:  is the infoSet adequate 
> for defining the features all XML systems must 
> support,

The features all XML systems (i.e. processors)
*must* support is very restrictive, and doesn't
at present even include GIs or element nesting.

*Should* support, well, who knows?  That's why
the Infoset doesn't pretend to be normative;
it's a library of names of features thought to
be generally useful.


-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• References:
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: XML Document - DOCTYPE vs Schema NS
• Next by Date: Re: XML versus Relational Database
• Previous by thread: RE: XML versus Relational Database
• Next by thread: RE: XML versus Relational Database
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread