• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Linda Grimaldi <grimlinda@e...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 10:39:44 -0600

You may awaken the WhyGrovesAreNeeded 
thread. :-)  

Let me ask this:  is the infoSet adequate 
for defining the features all XML systems must 
support, then what else is necessary to to 
define an "XML database" so we can 
figure out what the range of "decent" is?

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Linda Grimaldi [mailto:grimlinda@e...]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Benjamin Franz; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: XML versus Relational Database


Would anyone care to itemize the features they consider essential in a
"decent" XML database?  I have my own, but I am hopelessly biased...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML versus Relational Database
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Next by Date: Announce: w3make
• Previous by thread: RE: XML versus Relational Database
• Next by thread: Re: XML versus Relational Database
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread