• From: Jonathan.Robie@S...
• To: scarhill@y..., Jonathan.Robie@S..., xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:51:04 -0500

Yes, but we plan to post them separately. They took up too much room. I'll send them to you privately.

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Ancona
To: Jonathan.Robie@S...; xml-dev@l...
Sent: 2/22/01 3:44 PM
Subject: RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?

--- Jonathan.Robie@S... wrote:
> But that doesn't mean you make your poor user type in the XML. That's
what
> parsers are for. There are two executable grammars for XQuery in the
> appendix.

The JavaCC grammar in the appendix seems to be missing the token
definitions.
Are they available anywhere?

Thanks,

Jim

=====
Jim Ancona
jim@a...                     jancona@x...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices!
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

• Prev by Date: RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?
• Next by Date: Re: Embedding RDF metadata within an XML document
• Previous by thread: Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?
• Next by thread: RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread