• From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• To: Jonathan.Robie@S..., xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:44:04 -0800 (PST)

--- Jonathan.Robie@S... wrote:
> But that doesn't mean you make your poor user type in the XML. That's what
> parsers are for. There are two executable grammars for XQuery in the
> appendix.

The JavaCC grammar in the appendix seems to be missing the token definitions.
Are they available anywhere?

Thanks,

Jim

=====
Jim Ancona
jim@a...                     jancona@x...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/

• References:
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?
    • From: Jonathan.Robie@S...

• Prev by Date: RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?
• Next by Date: RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?
• Previous by thread: RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?
• Next by thread: RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread