Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jonathan Borden wrote: > > > > > > > The nature of a RDF document would obviously be > > "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#", then. > > yep. > > > > > What do you think of a new "alternative representation" purpose ? and > > what URL should we give it ? > > > > that is a fairly generic purpose, for example: > > http://www.rddl.org/purposes#purpose > > is the most generic purpose. > > For an RDF Schema is "alternative representation" the purpose? Is "schema > validation" the purpose? (i think not). The question is: What is the purpose > of an RDF Schema? I should have been more precise, sorry ;) . My request is for describing a location for a RDF document containing the same information than the RDDL but using a RDF syntax. This could be used as a pointer by tools/applications that would prefer a RDF syntax instead of the XLink one... When the pointer is missing, they can always perform a XSLT transformation, but when the document is also published as RDF why wouldn't they use it directly ? Eric (trying to reconciliate two worlds) > I'm happy to add "alternative-representation" as a generic purpose but I > think we can do better for RDF Schema. (note that in the RDDL spec, I don't > have a purpose for RDF Schema listed -- does that mean it has none? -- just > kidding.). > > -Jonathan -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
