• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:32:50 -0500

>
>
> The nature of a RDF document would obviously be
> "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#", then.

yep.

>
> What do you think of a new "alternative representation" purpose ? and
> what URL should we give it ?
>

that is a fairly generic purpose, for example:

http://www.rddl.org/purposes#purpose

is the most generic purpose.

For an RDF Schema is "alternative representation" the purpose? Is "schema
validation" the purpose? (i think not). The question is: What is the purpose
of an RDF Schema?

I'm happy to add "alternative-representation" as a generic purpose but I
think we can do better for RDF Schema. (note that in the RDDL spec, I don't
have a purpose for RDF Schema listed -- does that mean it has none? -- just
kidding.).

-Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What is the purpose of RDF Schema? was RE: What is the nature ofHTML4.0?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDLnaturesand purpose
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema]
• Next by Date: RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema]
• Previous by thread: Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDLnaturesand purpose
• Next by thread: Re: What is the purpose of RDF Schema? was RE: What is the nature ofHTML4.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread