• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 21:48:16 -0500

Edd Dumbill wrote -

>
> OK, I'll try again on this.  It seems to me that the sort of bundles we
> might want to be able to apply to documents in an indirected fashion, we
> might also reasonably want to apply in a hardwired manner too.  The
> problem I think I want solving is some kind of reconciliation between
> the proliferation of things like:
>
>  ...
> or inline them when deemed necessary.

Yes, I think being able to include the catalog in the document itself could be
very valuable, and we ought to make sure that it's possible as an option.

Cheers,

Tom P

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • RE: Namespace or document gloss?
    • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@i...>
  • Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
• Next by Date: RE: Related resources
• Previous by thread: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
• Next by thread: Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread