• From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@i...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 22:39:31 +0000

Edd Dumbill wrote,
> I was thinking along similar lines, too.  As indeed Paul Grosso 
> observed earlier there are elements of this that fit with the 
> "XML Packaging" thing.
>
> Maybe all that's needed is a way (PI or attribute) for a 
> document instance to indicate a relevant resource bundle (or 
> whatever it gets called...) -- or maybe documents can 
> incorporate inline aspects from the resource vocabulary.

I don't think that's the right way to go. By hardwiring
references to associated resources into the document instance
itself you make it impossible to reuse an existing doc with a
different collection of resources without modifying the doc, or
using some XML processor specific override mechanism (eg. a SAX
entity resolver).

I'm thinking of something more along the lines of the
Decorator Pattern ... which is what I was groping towards here,

  http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200101/msg00025.html

> Either way, I'm enormously happy to see this activity underway.

Ditto.

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                               InterX
Internet Systems Architect                5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)20 8817 4030                       London, W6 0LJ, England
msabin@i...                         http://www.interx.com/

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespace or document gloss?
• Next by Date: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespace or document gloss?
• Next by thread: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread