• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:53:46 +0100

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> At 04:01 PM 16/01/01 +0000, Miles Sabin wrote:
> >Actually I think it's simply two different problems which might
> >have related solutions,
> >
> >1. Allow for local overriding of authoritative resources.
> >
> >2. Allow for distribution and replication of authoritative
> >   resources.
> 
> Neither of which are specific to RDDL.  I assume everyone
> agrees with this.  

I do.

> In the general case, these are just
> consequences of dealing with URIs, n'est-ce pas? -T

Yes, but shouldn't we make sure that there is a reliable solution
somewhere which would be real fine and otherwise try to find a
workaround like other specifications have done in the past ?

Eric
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       Dyomedea                    http://dyomedea.com
http://xmlfr.org         http://4xt.org              http://ducotede.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: CDATA sections
• Next by Date: RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Previous by thread: RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Next by thread: RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread