• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:27:56 -0800

At 04:01 PM 16/01/01 +0000, Miles Sabin wrote:
>Actually I think it's simply two different problems which might
>have related solutions,
>
>1. Allow for local overriding of authoritative resources.
>
>2. Allow for distribution and replication of authoritative
>   resources.

Neither of which are specific to RDDL.  I assume everyone
agrees with this.  In the general case, these are just 
consequences of dealing with URIs, n'est-ce pas? -T

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Next by Date: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Previous by thread: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Next by thread: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread