• From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@e...>
• To: "inga.eckermann@p..." <inga.eckermann@p...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:31:03 +0000

I had quite a close look at the two and couldn't see and major advantages of either.....
except that ( and this is only MO ) RELAX seemed easier to understand.  Thus, I would say
that for someone new to XML it would provide a 'fast track' to creating dcument
descriptions.  Anyone else have any different opinion ?

Regards

Caroline


Inga Eckermann wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am new to this list and have read about you mentioning RELAX and TRX.
> Why do I need these standards? On the RELAX-webpage is written:
>
> Compared with DTD(Document Type Definition), RELAX has new features:
>
>                             RELAX grammars are represented in the XML instance syntax
>                             RELAX borrows rich datatypes of XML Schema Part 2
>                             RELAX is namespace-aware
>
> Is it not all included in Schemas as well?
>
> Mit freundlichen Grussen von
> Inga Eckermann
> ProFI Consult Gesellschaft fur Unternehmensberatung mbH
> -Anwendungsmanagement-
> Rendsburger Str. 34 * 30659 Hannover
> Tel.: 0511-9020-308
> mailto:inga.eckermann@p...

• References:
  • What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
    • From: Inga Eckermann <inga.eckermann@p...>

• Prev by Date: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
• Next by Date: Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
• Previous by thread: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
• Next by thread: Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread