• From: Inga Eckermann <inga.eckermann@p...>
• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:15:15 +0100

Hello,

I am new to this list and have read about you mentioning RELAX and TRX.
Why do I need these standards? On the RELAX-webpage is written:

Compared with DTD(Document Type Definition), RELAX has new features:

                            RELAX grammars are represented in the XML instance syntax 
                            RELAX borrows rich datatypes of XML Schema Part 2 
                            RELAX is namespace-aware 

Is it not all included in Schemas as well?

Mit freundlichen Grussen von
Inga Eckermann
ProFI Consult Gesellschaft fur Unternehmensberatung mbH
-Anwendungsmanagement-
Rendsburger Str. 34 * 30659 Hannover
Tel.: 0511-9020-308 
mailto:inga.eckermann@p... 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
    • From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@e...>
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
    • From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Next by Date: Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
• Previous by thread: The Division of Schema - A Practical Perspective (Re: Are we losingout because of grammars?)
• Next by thread: Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread