• From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:23:40 +1100

At 15:04 17/01/2001, Michael Mealling wrote:

>On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:19:56PM +1100, James Robertson wrote:
> > At 03:19 17/01/2001, Michael Mealling wrote:
> > > > 1. Allow for local overriding of authoritative resources.
> > >
> > >IMHO that's the c15n problem space...
> >
> > Damn these shortenings of words. They are
> > causing way too much o9n.
> >
> > A few extra letters would kill you?
>
>;-) You type it as much as I have and it will get annoying. Plus its
>what the IETF BOF group was called so its easier to find by using that
>acronym. But the point is valid. I'll try and spell it out
>more often. ;-)

I think you missed my subtle (?) point:

WHAT DOES IT STAND FOR ?!?

J

-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@s...

• References:
  • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
    • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
  • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
    • From: Michael Mealling <michael@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Next by Date: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Previous by thread: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Next by thread: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread