• From: Michael Mealling <michael@b...>
• To: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:04:01 -0500

On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:19:56PM +1100, James Robertson wrote:
> At 03:19 17/01/2001, Michael Mealling wrote:
> > > 1. Allow for local overriding of authoritative resources.
> >
> >IMHO that's the c15n problem space...
> 
> Damn these shortenings of words. They are
> causing way too much o9n.
> 
> A few extra letters would kill you?

;-) You type it as much as I have and it will get annoying. Plus its 
what the IETF BOF group was called so its easier to find by using that
acronym. But the point is valid. I'll try and spell it out
more often. ;-)

-MM

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Mealling	|      Vote Libertarian!       | www.rwhois.net/michael
Sr. Research Engineer   |   www.ga.lp.org/gwinnett     | ICQ#:         14198821
Network Solutions	|          www.lp.org          |  michaelm@n...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
    • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>

• References:
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
    • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@i...>
  • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
    • From: Michael Mealling <michael@b...>
  • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
    • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Next by Date: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Previous by thread: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Next by thread: Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread