• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 15:40:57 +0800

From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>

> The way I see it I'm looking for a standard way (by which I mean a
> vocabulary and syntax(es) on which we all agree) to describe related
> resources, and then ways to attach these to a namespace, a document, or
> a document fragment--or inline them when deemed necessary.  Can others
> see this use case?

For an example of the kind of related-resource decription that could be
pointed to, see my DrLove at http://www.ascc.net/~ricko/drlove.htm

Rick Jelliffe
Academia Sinica

• References:
  • RE: Namespace or document gloss?
    • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@i...>
  • Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
• Next by Date: Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
• Previous by thread: RE: Related resources
• Next by thread: RE: Namespace or document gloss?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread