Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 11:35 AM 12/31/00 -0800, Tim Bray wrote: >At 05:16 PM 30/12/00 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >>Sounds good. I've got a slightly lighter suggestion. The document at the >>namespace URI could be any well-formed XML, but the only content in it >>which matters for purposes of automated processing is simple XLinks. > >Hm... I'd like to force some aspects of HTML down their throats >to make it clear that it's an expectation that there be some >human-readable documentation. -Tim Fair enough, and I'm utterly sympathetic to that expectation. I'm just pondering how to make this play somewhat nice with the schema-at-the-URI approach Rick Jelliffe notes as being in the field already. Maybe XHTML inside of an xsd:documentation element, or links inside the appInfo... too many possibilities, none necessarily incompatible. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
