• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,"'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 11:35:39 -0800

At 05:16 PM 30/12/00 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>Sounds good.  I've got a slightly lighter suggestion.  The document at the
>namespace URI could be any well-formed XML, but the only content in it
>which matters for purposes of automated processing is simple XLinks.

Hm... I'd like to force some aspects of HTML down  their throats
to make it clear that it's an expectation that there be some
human-readable documentation. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: quick proposal
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • What should a namespace URI point to?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • RE: Begging the Question
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • RE: Begging the Question
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • quick proposal
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: XML Catalog proposal
• Next by Date: Re: XML Catalog proposal
• Previous by thread: quick proposal
• Next by thread: Re: quick proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread